6 comments on “Triple ASB Maelstrom Overpowered? – Well, Yes actually.

  1. You can even stagger them and after the initial cycle effectively have two running permanently – providing you use navy charges. ofc as long has you have charges… :)

  2. So, if I read this right, this ship would eat about 24M in charges in a reasonably extended fight ?

    Without any decent resists?

    Sorry, but I still don’t regard it as OP in the slightest. If it takes 3x a module, running 3x faction charges (costing 20% of hull cost per fight), its not overpowered.

    Especially if it applies to just one ship.

    Try fitting an ASB on a gila, for example, and try to make one work for L4 missions – it doesn’t.

    • Yeah, the expense is pretty high.. if you use just Navy 400 Cap Charges. This configuration probably could be just as effective using standard 400 cap charges in the short term. If the battle gets extended, that might be a problem, but for most small fights, the standard 400 charges, coupled with three XL ASBs that could be staggered so that you still have coverage during the 60 second reload timer, would be more than sufficient for those fights.

  3. My stats wtih: pyfa 1.1.9 git – Inferno 1.2
    Char: All Level 5

    EHP: 66.7k total (28.5k shield, 16.3k armor, 21,9k hull)
    Resis: 54.7% EM, 51% Thermal, 63.3% Kinetic 69.4% Explosive
    Shield Boost: 1818HP/s (all 3)- 2353HP/s overheated
    DPS: 622 ( 702 with drones )
    Speed: 835m/s

    were there any implants or bonuses involved when you calculated with EFT?
    or maybe I’m missing something… because this doesn’t seem the same ship as described on your post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s